• Art Features
  • How-To
  • Culture
  • Interviews
  • Best Of
  • On View
  • Cosmic Calling
  • Fresh Take
  • Sex Advice from an Artist
  • Art Living
  • Retrospect
  • This Artwork Changed My Life
  • Elephant 100

OUT NOW ISSUE #48

OUT NOW ISSUE #48

  • Art Features
  • How-To
  • Culture
  • Interviews
  • Best Of
  • On View
  • Cosmic Calling
  • Fresh Take
  • Sex Advice from an Artist
  • Art Living
  • Retrospect
  • This Artwork Changed My Life
  • Elephant 100
7 Nov 2019
Culture / Contemporary Classics

The Smiling Poop Emoji Conveys What Words Never Could

The pile of poop emoji was amongst the first to be introduced to audiences worldwide, and remains one of the most original (and unusual) of the emoji characters. [author]Louise Benson[/author] asks, what does it have to say about contemporary visual culture? Words by Louise Benson

If anything has changed the global cultural landscape in the last decade, it is surely the introduction of emoji to a western audience. First launched in Japan in 1999, it wasn’t until 2007 that Google introduced the set of pictorial characters to Gmail. By 2010, emoji had been approved by the Unicode Consortium, which was the launchpad to wider usage; it also meant that emoji was officially accepted in the industry as a real language. Fast-forward to 2015, and the Face with Tears of Joy emoji (😂)was crowned Word of the Year by the Oxford Dictionary.

The rich variety of imagery offered by emoji, with their ability to convey the ambiguity that characterizes real-life conversation, have lent the visual language a fluidity that has kept it relevant. There is seemingly always an emoji suitable to any given situation, no matter how ridiculous it might be. The power of the picture is the immediacy of its impact and, to paraphrase, a well-chosen emoji is worth a thousand words.

Tweet this

“Enigmatic and absurd, the pile of poop emoji is notable for its anthropomorphic twist on an innately human concern”

But there is one emoji that stands out from the crowd, and that is the smiling poop emoji. Enigmatic and absurd, with a cheekily defiant grin, the pile of poop emoji is notable for its anthropomorphic twist on an innately human concern. When you’ve got to go, you’ve got to go, and the introduction of a simple smiley face offers a humorous, deeply silly note to proceedings. There’s no doubt that it has struck a chord with audiences. When it was first launched in Japan, the poop emoji quickly became one of the most-used icons.

And yet, when Google were first in discussions with the creators of the emoji poop, there was widespread resistance towards the contentious little character. Google worried that it wouldn’t translate well to their audiences, who might take offence at the representation of faeces in such a flippant form. It was down to its creators to persuade them otherwise, citing the immense popularity of the poop emoji in Japan. The distinctive shape of the poop emoji, uncomfortably reminiscent of a soft-serve ice-cream (just try not to think of it as chocolate-flavoured), is loosely based on an anime character named Dr Slump. Broadcast in Japan during the 1980s, it starred a pink poop character who makes light of toilet-related issues.

The emoji won Google over in the end, but its first iteration in their initial release saw the friendly poop transformed to a simple turd without the smiley face. It even had wiggly stink lines and flies circling above it. Without the face, the emoji poop became less ambiguous and more literal; less funny and more functional. However, as the lead of the Google Doodle team stated in an interview in 2014, “I would reject the notion that [the poop emoji] has one meaning. It’s a symbol in context, sort of like memes.”

Tweet this

“Without the face, the emoji poop became less ambiguous and more literal; less funny and more functional”

Thus, the pile of poop emoji has only gathered momentum as time has gone on, with a number of minor adjustments to its beaming face (Google has since dropped the flies and adopted the smile, too). In 2017, there was even a heated discussion over the possible introduction of an additional “sad face” poop emoji. The idea was eventually dropped, but the original looks set to remain, having become almost as ubiquitous as emoji itself.

After all, humans have long been fascinated by their own bodily inputs and outputs (to put it politely), and it is little surprise that artists have dabbled in their fair share of poop-related art. From Maurizio Cattelan’s (recently notorious) golden toilet to Helen Chadwick’s Piss Flowers (2016), not to mention Paul McCarthy’s oversized inflatable turds in Complex Shit (2008), human waste is perhaps the most universal subject of all. That it has been such a hit in its emoji form only goes to show that, sometimes, it is the simplest and most base of concerns that unites us. It seems that some things cannot be expressed in words; sometimes, only a smiling pile of poop will do.

 

Interested in learning how to create your own illustrations? Check out Elephant Academy’s online classes and workshops.

Share with

MORE TO READ

Read Next:

The Snapchat Ghost Perfectly Encapsulates the Last Decade

Culture

The Snapchat Ghost Perfectly Encapsulates the Last Decade

With its silliness and spontaneity, Snapchat heralded a new era of rebellious authenticity in the face of over-curated digital perfection. Is its time finally up?
Read More
Art Living

Dawoud Bey’s Up-Close Snapshots of a Changing Generation

A new collection highlights the storytelling of the US artist’s intimate street photography.
Read More
Culture

Welcome to the LOL House: The Cynical Legacy of DIS

The New York art collective co-opted the tools of marketing and commerce to slick and savage effect. Louise Benson clicks on their history and wonders about their future.
Read More
Julia Fox arrives at the Vanity Fair Oscar party during the 94th Academy Awards, March 2022. Photo: Danny Moloshok. Credit: REUTERS / Alamy Stock Photo
Culture

Performance Anxiety: Will We Ever Meet the Real Julia Fox?

Actress, artist, dominatrix, celeb sensation… the New Yorker ticks all those boxes, but is it all just a giant work of art?
Read More

Keep in the loop

Get our weekly newsletter straight to your inbox

HUNGRY FOR MORE?

All Editorials
Contemporary Classics

Just Between Us… What Is the Secret Appeal of Liminal Spaces?

Contemporary Classics

How the Ikea Monkey in a Sheepskin Jacket Changed Visual Culture Forever

Contemporary Classics

Domestic Bliss? How The Sims Made a Virtue of Staying In 

Opinion

The Sad Irony of Juergen Teller’s “Lazy” W Magazine Shoot

Best Of

Art Crush: All the Things We Want This Month

Picture Gallery

Meet the Next Generation of Photographic Artists

Opinion

Is Colourising Archive Images Ever OK?

Observations

Could Art Duo Shanzhai Lyric Fake It Till They Made It in New York?

Article

A Snapshot Guide to the Bristol Photo Festival

Snapshot

“Ready… Fight!”: Cosplaying with China’s Generation Y

Anton Hickel, Portrait of Marie-Thérèse, Princesse de Lamballe, 1788 via Wikimedia Commons
Article

Our Essential Guide to the 20 Best Culture Newsletters to Sign Up to Now

Illustration by Rosie Barker for Elephant
Opinion

A Picture of a Thousand Words: How Screenshots Changed Visual Culture

March to Molesworth, 1985
Essential Art Books

Journey Through a World of Ideas with August’s Best Art Books

Profile

Hetain Patel: “I Want to Make the South Asian Black Panther”

Elephant Kiosk

Kiosk Wishlist: All the Art Gifts You Need This Month

Opinion

Some Like It Not: What Happened When Kim Kardashian Wore Marilyn Monroe’s Dress?

  • About Us
  • Write for Us
  • Stockists
  • Privacy Policy
Follow Us
Instagram Facebook Twitter